J.D. and W. W-S....
Today in class we had a get deal of discussion on our papers and how we can make them better. We broke off into our separate small groups and went over each other’s introduction, establishing what was good, what needed work, and finally what was missing in each paper. After that we evaluated each other’s interview questions by establishing what questions needed improvement, what questions were good, and finally we helped each other generate other possible questions. We also learned how to properly site an interview in APA style. It seemed to be very beneficial to our class when we went over the introduction and interviews of our paper. We had a chance to clear up any unsure questions about the paper before we began.
Prior to going over our questions and introductions, we were each asked to evaluate how we were doing as far as accomplishing our physical intelligence goal. I believe that the general consensus was that although we had succeeded in portions of the goal, there was still a need for some work and sustaining what had already been done. As we went around the room it also sounded like people overall where satisfied with their success.
Finally, in the online e-discussions this week we briefly summarized two articles we are planning to or are already using in our research paper. Everyone appeared to have some very good articles and those who didn’t made it apparent that their information was going to come to them through their interview(s). Which leads us to the second part of the e-discussion for this week; which was to establish two things we learned from the interview web site that could help us with your project.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home